Thursday, January 29, 2026
Home Blog Page 254

From ferrets to fish to gray bats, here are the 21 endangered species of Kansas

0

Kansas is the home of 21 endangered species and another 29 that are threatened.

The world has more than 7,000 endangered species, and the United States designates a species as threatened or endangered if the following occurs:

  • Its habitat or range is threatened with destruction, modification or curtailment.
  • It is overutilized for commercial, recreational, scientific or educational purposes.
  • It is diseased or overly predated.
  • Existing regulatory mechanisms to protect the animal are inadequate.
  • If natural or manmade factors are affecting a species’ continued existence.

In Kansas, there are more than 20,000 species, and some may be listed as endangered due to the rarity of an animal’s specialized adaption or to an imminent threat to the species continued existence.

Kansas’s endangered mammals

There are only two endangered mammals in Kansas. The black-footed ferret lived throughout central and western Kansas and have typically lived alongside prairie dogs, which make up about 90% of its diet.

The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks points to conversion of its habitat to rangeland and the poisoning of prairie dogs. The black-footed ferret was declared extinct in 1979, but later surveys discovered wild populations. It’s now believed there are about 200 mature black-footed ferret in the wild across 18 populations.

The gray bat is a species of microbat with a habitat in Kansas carving out a sliver of the Ozark Plateau in the southeastern corner of the state. Though the bat is “almost totally cave dwelling,” according to the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, its only known population in Kansas is a series of storm sewers in the southeast corner of the state.

Kansas’s endangered birds

The least tern is a small migratory bird that can be found throughout Kansas during migratory periods in the summer. Of three subspecies of least terns, two are considered endangered.

The largest American bird, the whooping crane, has historical habitat in south-central Kansas, where it generally passed through during migratory periods in spring and fall. The species declined due to unregulated hunting and habitat loss, it rebounded from a low of just 21 wild whooping cranes in 1941 to about 800 birds today.

Kansas’s endangered fish

The pallid sturgeon can get as large as five feet long, and usually reside in main channels of large turbid rivers where currents are swift. The fish was common during the 20th century, but it’s believed habitat loss dwindled the numbers with the channeling and damming of the Missouri River.

Three species of chub are considered endangered:

  • Peppered chub.
  • Sicklefin chub.
  • Silver Chub.

The 2.5-inch peppered chub is found in the lower Arkansas River and its major tributaries, but due to the dewatering of western Kansas streams, it’s now limited to lower portions of the river’s basin in Kansas.

The sicklefin chub is found in the Missouri River in the northeast portion of the state, favoring areas with a strong current.

The silver chub used to be common in the Kansas and Missouri rivers, but the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History hasn’t documented a specimen in the Kansas River since 1980.

The Arkansas River Shiner was formerly common in the Arkansas River but is reliant on flood flows and has fared poorly with reduced streamflow.

Kansas endangered amphibians

The spotted cave salamander, like the gray bat, is only present in a small sliver of the Ozark Plateau in southeast Kansas. It lives in pitch-black caves or near cold springs in the forest. The second edition “Pocket Guide to Kansas Threatened and Endangered Species” says the salamander is a “unique component of Kansas natural heritage” because the habitat itself is uncommon in Kansas.

The grotto salamander resides in the same region as the spotted cave salamander in southeast Kansas. They are blind cave-dwelling salamander that grow up to 5 inches long.

Kansas’s endangered invertebrates

Of the 11 endangered invertebrates in Kansas, eight are mussels:

  • Elktoe mussel.
  • Ellipse mussel.
  • Flat floater mussel.
  • Mucket Mussel.
  • Neosho mucket mussel.
  • Rabbitsfoot mussel.
  • Western fanshell mussel.
  • Cylindrical papershell mussel.

    There are also two endangered species of beetle in the state, with the American burying beetle losing ground in the eastern third of the state and the Scott optioservus riffle beetle only known to reside in Scott State Park in Scott County.

    The slender walker snail has one isolated population in northeast Kansas wetlands. The U.S. government doesn’t consider them endangered, but Kansas does.

    As reported in the Topeka Capital Journal

Kansas Soybean Commission establishes direction for fiscal year 2026

0

Board focuses on opportunities to improve, move soybeans.

Kansas Soybean Commissioners convened in early December at the Kansas Soybean Office in Topeka to deliberate funding proposals and establish the budget for the 2026 fiscal year, which runs July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026.

The board of volunteer farmer-leaders worked through 41 funding proposals from researchers, agricultural educators and national industry groups looking to bring value to the soybean growers, buyers and consumers. Lower prices and tough growing conditions in recent years significantly reduced soybean checkoff collections available for investment.

Following critical conversation, 27 projects were selected for implementation with the start of the next fiscal year. Objectives for the selected projects focus on field research to enhance crop viability, educational experiences to engage youth and teachers, and market development initiatives to build demand domestically and abroad. Additionally, Commissioners approved their core program budget, partially executed by contract with the Kansas Soybean Association, to implement state projects not related to membership or policy.

“We had a lot of extremely good projects presented at this meeting,” Chairman Keith Miller, Great Bend, says. “Our frustration with the recent price and weather challenges is that we currently do not have as many funds as we would like to so we can greenlight more of these projects. We do not want our researchers to back off from submitting proposals as we anticipate a rebound in funds. We did our best to fund numerous quality projects with the capital we have to benefit soybean growers in our state.”

The soybean checkoff, in which farmers contribute one-half of one percent of the sale price of their soybeans, generates the funding available for investment each year. The objective of the soybean checkoff is to improve profitability for soybean farmers, which can be accomplished through improving efficiency of soybean production and finding new ways to use the crop after harvest, among other directives.

The collective work of the national soybean checkoff has grown the impact of U.S. soybeans to add $9.8 billion in value to the U.S. gross domestic product, as announced by the United Soybean Board Dec. 6.

“The soybean checkoff exists to promote market development and drive research that focuses on managing disease, pests and more,” Miller says. “It is very important to try to get all our priorities in line with what we need for production. That’s where your checkoff dollars are making a huge difference for the future of the soybean industry.”

Further details about individual projects included in the budget are expected to be released ahead of the fiscal year. Information about how the soybean checkoff is working on behalf of farmers is always available at www.kansassoybeans.org or by contacting Administrator Kaleb Little by phone at 785-271-1040.

About Kansas Soybean

The Kansas Soybean Commission, established in 1977, includes nine volunteer farmer-commissioners who are elected by their peers. They oversee investments of the legislated “soybean checkoff” assessment in research, consumer information, market development, industry relations and farmer outreach to improve the profit opportunities for all Kansas soybean farmers.

K-State researchers aim to develop soil sensors that will measure farm fields at the nanoscale

0
National Science Foundation awards $2M for innovative project.

Kansas State University researchers have received a $2 million award from the National Science Foundation’s Global Centers program to develop sensors that can more accurately detect nutrients, chemical compounds, soil microbiomes and greenhouse gases in soil.

Suprem Das, an associate professor in K-State’s Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, said advancing soil sensors –and allowing farmers to collect soil information in real time – “is essential for advancing precision agriculture and promoting sustainable practices.”

Das will lead the project of more than a half dozen scientists aiming to develop sensors using atomically thin carbon sheets in which the actual sensing events occur at the nanoscale, defined as a dimension between 1 and 100 nanometers.

To visualize the nanoscale, consider that a single strand of human hair is approximately 80,000 to 100,000 nanometers wide; a sheet of standard copy paper is about 100,000 nanometers thick.

“When you make things smaller and smaller and eventually go to a nanoscale, you can fundamentally see different properties of those things you are measuring,” Das said. “We are able to exploit some of those properties to make these sensors so they can better measure the properties we’re after.”

Raj Khosla, head of K-State’s Department of Agronomy, notes that researchers think that employing sensors at a nanoscale may help them more accurately and more quickly measure nitrogen in farm fields.

Nitrogen is a vital nutrient in agriculture, enabling crops to capture sunlight energy through photosynthesis, and thus increase growth and yield.

“The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s innovation agenda says that by 2050, our country will reduce our nitrogen consumption by 50%,” Khosla said.

“But before we can think of reducing nitrogen waste in farm fields, we need to be able to measure how much of it is in the plant and soil,” he said. “The soil sensors we will be developing will allow us to measure rates of nitrates in soil instantly, and eventually we’ll work on measuring the rates of nitrogen in plants throughout the field.”

According to the U.S. Government’s National Nanotechnology Initiative, nanostructured materials are stronger and possess transformative physical properties that often make them better at conducting electricity and heat; are strong in mechanical strength; and are suitable for chemical detection, among other desired qualities.

In 2022, Khosla and a team of K-State agronomy researchers announced that they were working on a biodegradable soil sensor – roughly the size of a postage stamp – that could measure soil properties of a farm field so that in a matter of seconds, farmers could adjust water, nitrogen and other inputs to abundantly grow crops.

“In talking with Suprem, he told me, ‘well, you’re doing this at a micro scale; we can do it at a nanoscale,’” Khosla said. “So I was very excited. My emphasis is to create the ability to collect data at a high spatial density so that – for example, you’ve heard of No Child Left Behind – well, I have a policy that no corner of the farm field should be left behind.”

“I am focused heavily on agriculture and agricultural applications. Suprem and his team are focused on nanoscale materials, physics and engineering. I couldn’t have thought of a better team to come together.”

Khosla notes that on-farm use of nanoscale soil sensors is several years away, “but unless we start working now, it’s not going to happen.”

The K-State team includes experts in chemistry and chemical engineering, data science, omics (a field of biological study that analyzes the structure and function of an organism’s biomolecules and molecular processes), microbiology and metabolic engineering. Das said the project also is focused on technology development and commercialization, involving a team from K-State’s College of Business Administration.

The initial research and testing of the nanoscale sensors will take place on K-State’s North Farm in Manhattan, but Das said it will eventually spread to sites in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Das also anticipates forming a Global Center to help train students in interdisciplinary research and education and increase understanding of the capability of the proposed sensors.

“When we think of these sensors, it’s not a matter of ‘if’ they will be developed; it’s a matter of ‘when’ they will be developed,” Das said. “And we’re a lot closer today than we ever have been before.”

He notes the variety of researchers with varied expertise on the team: “Our challenge will be to develop very robust algorithms to be able to translate millions of data points from these sensors, then process them, analyze them, store them and derive decisions in near real time for farmers to use.”

The project, Das said, is the first successful example of leveraging K-State’s GRIP (game-changing research initiation program) award to attract highly competitive federal grants.

Funding for K-State’s work begins on Jan. 1, 2025.

Fido & Robo

0
Thayne Cozart
Milo Yield

Email: [email protected]

Web: www.miloyield.com

Most folks will agree that dogs are really “man’s best friend.” After all, in general, the world’s “Fidos” are loyal, warm & cuddly, friendly, protective, non-judgmental, and forgiving. Nothing much more you could ask for as a “best friend.”

But, what about 15-pound mechanical “Robo” dogs that are capable of scaling a 16-foot fence in one second and have mechanical gamma ray detector sniffers that can analyze and quickly assess the health of soil?

That comparison is real — 00at least in Great Britain. In a news article I read this week, Robo dog is controlled via a remote screen. The four-legged machine is shown stomping on the spot in the soil that’s in need of nutritional help. It’s very similar action to a dog digging for a bone.

“Robo” has even adopted features to make it as likable as man’s best friend. It can sit on command and even wave a paw like it’s canine counterpart. Robo’s developers say their little robot dog army can help on rural land because they can be sent into deep ditches, into thick woodlands, underneath bushes and trees.

The Brit developers described some of the robo dog’s incredible features, including 3D depth sensors and stereo cameras. The developers are now working with farmers to understand what would be the most useful way to progress the robo dogs for their use in the field. Gamma ray spectroscopy and full infrared features are in the works, which would allow the machines to test soil real-time in the field. This would remove the need to send a sample back to the laboratory, reducing time and money spent.

The negative about Robo dogs, however, is this: the long-term investment is not so cheap with the gamma detector capable of measuring naturally occurring levels of radiation in the soil costing 25,000 British pounds ($32,000 dollars). But, the autonomous agricultural platform runs entirely electric and once set up can be self-deployed on a mission, monitored entirely through a computer, tablet or smart phone.

Malcolm Barrett, a British farmer working with the nature-friendly trials, claims to have seen dramatic improvements in his soil with less flooding and more worms. He says, “We’re learning more about what the soil can do for us, and what we can do for the soil. It’s helping everyone by helping the environment and we’re getting huge benefits on our farm too.”

Well, my take on Robo dogs is this: Robo may eventually find its way onto the world’s farms and ranches, but Robo will have to co-exist as second-fiddle to Fido because only Fido is able to look lovingly into your eyes and give you a warm, juicy lick on your face. Fido’s place as man’s best friend in safe.

***

Last week I related a told-as-true story that wuz told by my friend Howie Didditt at our morning Old Geezers Coffee klatch. Well, here’s another of Howie’s stories that he told as the truth.

Back in the days of his callow youth in north-central Kansas, Howie and a friend restored a 1928 Ford to running condition. Neither kid wuz old enuf to legally drive on public roads, so their inventive minds came up with a solution. To their delight, they discovered that the wheels on the old car perfectly matched the width of a standard railroad.

So, without thinking their plan through to the end, they launched their car-on-rail trip. They knew the train schedule so they weren’t worried about meeting a train. They had hours to enjoy the trip.

They hadn’t gone many hands-free driving miles when they passed through a nearby town with a grain elevator located next to the train tracks. As they passed by the elevator, they merrily waved to some of the elevator workers and continued on their way.

Eventually, they decided to turn back toward home base, but they had a big problem. They couldn’t get the old Ford turned around on the tracks. As they pondered their dilemma, who should happen to drive up on the scene but Howie’s dad and his buddy’s dad, too, in a pickup truck. Someone at the grain elevator had given them a phone call.

After getting a stern lecture about their wayward ways, and the promise of some appropriate disciplinary action, the two seniors said for safety’s sake, they’d better drive the old Ford back to its starting point.

They instructed Howie and friend to carefully drive the pickup home by staying exclusively on rural roads — no blacktop or through towns. And, that’s what the kids did.

After they arrived home, the boys waited with sinking feelings for their elders to arrive on the rail tracks.

And, eventually, the dad’s showed up. But a few minutes before they arrived, the boys could hear their Dad’s roaring with laughter and clearly enjoying their hand-free driving trip home. When they dismounted and extracted the Ford from the tracks, they mutually agreed that there’d been no real harm done and the entire episode should be filed away as a two-family memory — but with absolutely no repeat performance.

And, that’s what happened.

***

The way life forms are being shifted around scientifically these days, I thought of a new combination that could prove real handy on cattle enterprises.

Scientists need to some way incorporate the herbicide Round-up into the genetic profile of bovines.

The result would be labor-free Round-up Ready cattle herds.

***

My words of wisdom for this week are these: “Courtship is that short amount of time between lipstick and mop stick.”

And, “Anyone who marries for money earns every cent of it.”

Have a good ‘un

“Anatomical Variations: Connecting Research & Patient Care”

0

The human body is composed of a typical pattern of anatomy, yet every structure varies in form from person to person. For example, humans develop with a standard set of defined muscles, yet the shape and mass of each muscle varies significantly among individuals. Sometimes, “anatomical variations” develop – that is, anatomical structures that do not conform to the typical range of regular morphology (for example, an entirely separate “extra” muscle that develops in one person).

Human anatomy is so intricate that the prevalence of an anatomical variation is thought to be certain in every individual; in this regard, what makes each of us unique is the very thing we have in common. Certain variations can elicit complex symptoms, muddle diagnoses, and complicate treatments. Fortunately, though, most anatomical variations are asymptomatic and pose little to no clinical concern. Sometimes variations can even be beneficial; for example, an accessory muscle-tendon unit can be useful autograft material in musculoskeletal reconstruction surgeries.

Anatomical variations are challenging to study because they are often found incidentally. In surgery, clinicians operate in a limited window of visibility in order to complete procedures with minimal incisions. When surgeons find an unexpected variation in their operating window, they often only see part of it and are not able to expose the entire structure. Anatomists, however, dissect the entire body (as an embalmed cadaver) and expose variations in full detail. Cadaveric case analyses of anatomical variations provide clinicians with insights for adjusting protocols to suit variations during surgery and in noninvasive treatment plans, and they help anatomists teach clinically significant variations to students learning human anatomy.

Strategic anatomist-clinician collaborations foster the mutual exchange of expert-level skills to promote the highest-quality medical education and patient care, particularly involving anatomical variations. These collaborative relationships form the fundamental underpinning of evidenced-based medicine and embrace the “bench-to-bedside” model for making translational research influential to patient care.

Modern technology has improved the study of anatomical variations. Many anatomical case analyses now involve radiologic imaging, histopathology, digital modeling, and other contemporary techniques, making them more relevant to clinicians and patient care. In the fast-paced disciplines of education and medicine, innovations such as virtual reality (VR) are being used to advance anatomy education and improve patient care. While defined variations and clinical conditions can be simulated by technology and offer many impactful benefits, tech-based programs are currently unable to generate accurate models of potential anatomical variations.

For the nearly 2500 years, human cadavers from whole body donors have served instrumental roles in establishing anatomical knowledge, including what is known about anatomical variations. Human cadavers are unparalleled for tactile feedback, unscripted anatomical variations, and clinical associations. They also convey more than anatomy; they are considered by most students as their first patients and teach students about clinical anatomy, variation, disease, ethics, humanity, respect, and many other important values. Educators, clinicians, and students remain extremely grateful to whole body donors for their selfless contributions to advancing medical education, knowledge, practice, and patient care – particularly as related to anatomical variations.

Ethan Snow, PhD is an Anatomist and currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Innovation in Anatomy at South Dakota State University in Brookings, South Dakota. Follow The Prairie Doc® at www.prairiedoc.org, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Threads. Prairie Doc Programming includes On Call with the Prairie Doc®, a medical Q&A show (most Thursdays at 7pm streaming on Facebook), 2 podcasts, and a Radio program (on SDPB), providing health information based on science, built on trust.