Thursday, February 12, 2026
Home Blog Page 449

KU News: Political anger seems to override inhibitions online, study finds

0

From the Office of Public Affairs | http://www.news.ku.edu

Headlines

Political anger seems to override inhibitions online, study finds

LAWRENCE — The desire to express political anger seems so strong that it overrides the instinct, found in older research, to control one’s anger in public, according to a new paper co-written by a University of Kansas associate professor of communication studies. Ashley Muddiman is co-author of the study “Emotion Work on Social Media: Differences in Public and Private Emotions about Politics and COVID-19 on Facebook,” published in late 2023 in the journal Social Media + Society.

Study finds clear instruction, parental support predict students’ sense of school belonging

LAWRENCE — A new study from the University of Kansas has analyzed the roles classroom interaction and parental support play in school connectedness, finding that students who feel their teachers provide good classroom management felt supported by those teachers and that they belong in their school. Those who felt they had more support from their parents also felt like they belonged in school, but parent support did not predict feelings of teacher support. The study was published in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

KU research center to host global audience for premier developmental disabilities research conference

LAWRENCE — The KU Life Span Institute will welcome more than 350 scientists, graduate students and practitioners from the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities to the 56th annual Gatlinburg Conference, which will take place April 17-19 in Kansas City, Missouri. Registration for the conference is open, and all activities will take place at the InterContinental Kansas City at the Plaza.

All We Can Save series will highlight discussion on clean energy transition

LAWRENCE — The All We Can Save series at the University of Kansas returns March 28 with a virtual event titled “The Power of Local Advocacy: Beyond Coal to Clean Energy,” featuring Mary Anne Hitt, senior director of Climate Imperative. Hitt will join Ali Brox, assistant teaching professor of environmental studies, for this moderated event, with opportunities for audience members to ask questions. The program will take place at 3 p.m.; register online on Zoom.

 

Full stories below.

 

————————————————————————

 

Contact: Rick Hellman, KU News Service, 785-864-8852, [email protected], @RickHellman

Political anger seems to override inhibitions online, study finds

 

LAWRENCE — A new study gives clues as to why anger is so pervasive in political discussions on social media.

The desire to express political anger seems so strong that it overrides the instinct, found in older research, to control one’s anger in public, according to a new paper co-written by a University of Kansas associate professor of communication studies.

In “Emotion Work on Social Media: Differences in Public and Private Emotions about Politics and COVID-19 on Facebook” published in late 2023 in the journal Social Media + Society, KU’s Ashley Muddiman and Emily Van Duyn of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ran an experiment with 518 people, comparing how they expressed emotion online about the topic of COVID-19 versus politics in general. They also compared the participants’ expression of emotion about the two topics compared with their actual feelings. For example, did they outwardly express what they were feeling inside, or did they hide their feelings? The latter condition, Muddiman said, is known as performing “emotional work.”

The experiment took place in early 2021, when COVID-19 vaccines were still rolling out across the country. Participants were asked to craft, but not to actually post, a social media post about one of the two topics.

Then, per the paper, “Participants were asked … to indicate how much anger and anxiety they felt when crafting their specific message from never to often …” Human coders then compared the emotions expressed in their posts to their inner feelings.

The authors write that theories of emotion work in communication suggest that people repress expressions of anger in public, fearing a loss of control over who receives the message. However, the experiment showed that was not the case with political posts. People asked to write political posts felt more angry than people asked to write posts about COVID-19, and were the most likely to express anger in public social media posts, Muddiman said.

“Just because people felt an emotion didn’t mean they always expressed that emotion,” the KU researcher said.

That was particularly true with regard to online expressions about the pandemic.

“There were a lot of reasons to be mad about the situation surrounding COVID,” Muddiman said. “And people were not necessarily expressing that in public settings in our study.

“It seemed like people were … not just saying, ‘I feel angry. I’m going to express that anger online,’ but they were being a little more strategic with expressing their emotions.

“The other big takeaway is that there’s something about politics online that overrides that. If somebody felt angry, and they were expressing themselves about politics in a public setting, they were very willing to express that anger, which was against what we expected. We thought that people would tamp down their expression of anger, that even if they were very angry, they wouldn’t want to share their political anger in public. And that was actually the opposite of what we found. So there’s something about politics that made people want to express their anger publicly. That was very interesting to me.”

“We didn’t test this directly,” Muddiman said, “but we can speculate at least that in our current political landscape, anger can actually show that you care about your political identity. And so there’s something about being a partisan in public that gives people leverage in a political situation.

“I think our findings show that people might actually see expressing anger as a good thing in public, even though, theoretically, we thought it was going to be different than that. We thought that people would kind of rein in their anger because they were not in control of the people they were talking to. So we think there’s something about anger that just overrides a lot of this and that invites or encourages people to share their political identities … in public with everyone. And that might be one of the reasons why we see so much anger online, even when it’s not always what people are feeling. There’s a cachet to expressing anger in online political settings.”

-30-

————————————————————————

The official university account for X (formerly Twitter) is @UnivOfKansas.

Follow @KUnews for KU News Service stories, discoveries and experts.

 

———————————————————————

 

Contact: Mike Krings, KU News Service, 785-864-8860, [email protected], @MikeKrings

Study finds clear instruction, parental support predict students’ sense of school belonging

 

LAWRENCE — A new study from the University of Kansas has analyzed the roles classroom interaction and parental support play in school connectedness, finding clearly communicated instruction in class and support from parents are closely linked with belonging.

The study found students who feel their teachers provide good classroom management felt supported by those teachers and that they belong in their school. Those who felt they had more support from their parents also felt like they belonged in school, but parent support did not predict feelings of teacher support. Understanding the links between support and school connectedness can help students succeed as well as help schools and teachers use practices that foster belonging, according to the researchers.

Anqi Peng, doctoral student in KU’s School of Education & Human Sciences, has a scholarly interest in student-school connections. She began this research journey by studying school outcomes for students who are learning English as a second language while being educated in English-only classes in American schools.

“It made me think a lot about identity and how students felt about school connection and if they felt they were supported,” Peng said. “And I found there wasn’t much research into how we can foster school connectedness. Research had shown that school connectedness decreases during adolescence, but not necessarily why or how we can facilitate it. That’s what we’re hoping to learn more about.”

For the study, authors analyzed data from 4,838 high school students in the United States from the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment. Students in the data set expressed how much support they felt in a variety of school and family factors. For school they specifically examined classroom management, instructional support and emotional support. The students were also asked about how much parental support they felt.

Results showed classroom interactions to be the factor that most predicted teacher support and belonging to school. Especially in terms of classroom management, students who felt their teachers managed class well by minimizing classroom disruptions had a higher sense of connection to their schools. Instructional support, in which students that felt teachers set clear goals and adapted lessons to fulfill students’ learning needs, also positively predicted teacher support, but emotional support was not related to teacher support or school belonging.

The study, co-written by Peng; Meagan Patterson, professor of educational psychology; and Sean Joo, assistant professor of educational psychology, all of KU, was published in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

“I think this study shows the importance of classroom management and instructional support and that their impact may have been underestimated, compared to emotional support from teachers,” Patterson said. “I feel that’s an important area of focus for future research. We also know that how students feel about school is not static, so we’d like to look at if this changes over time.”

“Teacher support is more related to specific behaviors in the classroom. Parental support is more related to school connectedness in general,” Peng said. “We are looking at both feelings of support from teachers in a certain class and school belonging in general. Students move through classes throughout the day, so we wanted to see a bit more about how these things fit together.”

Students were asked about their feelings of in-class interactions during their English classes.

“There is a certain emotional vulnerability that comes up in English class that we thought might make English classes especially important for how students feel in relation to their school,” Patterson said.

The authors said more understanding of what fosters school connectedness can help schools, teachers and families provide more developmentally appropriate supports necessary to help students feel like they connect to their schools, as well as demonstrate the importance of higher education to prepare teachers that are skilled at classroom management and instructional support. The study is part of Peng’s larger body of work on bilingual education and cognitive function in learning and Patterson’s research in parent-child relationships.

The authors said they hope to build on the research by gauging students’ feeling of connection over time, or throughout a school year.

“We need much more information on how school connectedness could be fostered,” Peng said. “But this does highlight the importance of parental support and especially effective classroom management and how expressing clear expectations in teaching can foster connection.”

-30-

————————————————————————

Subscribe to KU Today, the campus newsletter,

for additional news about the University of Kansas.

 

http://www.news.ku.edu

————————————————————————

 

Contact: Jen Humphrey, Life Span Institute, 785-864-6621, [email protected], @kulifespan

KU research center to host global audience for premier developmental disabilities research conference

 

LAWRENCE — The KU Life Span Institute will welcome more than 350 scientists, graduate students and practitioners from the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities to the 56th annual Gatlinburg Conference, which will take place April 17-19 in Kansas City, Missouri.

Registration for the conference is open and ranges from $475 for academic professionals to $200 for self-advocates, early career researchers and students. All conference activities will be held at the InterContinental Kansas City at the Plaza.

Co-hosted by the Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD), the conference is a forum for exchanging information and new findings in behavioral and biobehavioral research and theory, said John Colombo, director of the KU Life Span Institute.

“The Gatlinburg Conference is where, for over 50 years, senior and early-stage investigators gather every year to share their most recent work on intellectual and developmental disabilities,” Colombo said. “It’s specifically devoted to graduate students, postdocs and early-stage scientists, and so it has served as the literal launching ground for many careers in the field.”

The 2024 conference, which is named for the city in which it began in the 1960s, features talks by:

Beth Tarini, associate director at the Center for Translational Research and professor of pediatrics at George Washington University. She leads research on optimizing the delivery of genetic services to families and children, with a focus on screenings for newborns.

Maya Sabatello, associate professor of medical sciences at the Center for Precision Medicine and Genomics and the Division of Ethics at Columbia University. Her work focuses on law, society and disability, and the implications of genetics, especially in pediatrics and judicial settings.

Ami Klin, director of the Marcus Autism Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University School of Medicine. Klin’s research is focused on the emergence of the social mind and brain from infancy to adulthood.

Other highlights include a preconference workshop on science communication led by Liz Weintraub, a senior advocacy specialist at the AUCD and host of “Tuesdays with Liz” on YouTube, with Beth Haller, author of “Disabled People Transforming Media Culture for a More Inclusive World.”

There will be conference sessions on funding strategies, a panel presentation about early life identification of intellectual and developmental disabilities, and updates from the National Institutes of Health.

Additional information on registration, accommodations, transportation and accessibility is available through the Gatlinburg conference website.

-30-

————————————————————————

Don’t miss new episodes of “When Experts Attack!,”

a KU News Service podcast hosted by Kansas Public Radio.

 

https://kansaspublicradio.org/podcast/when-experts-attack

————————————————————————

 

Contact: Emily Ryan, The Commons, 785-864-6293, [email protected], @TheCommonsKU

All We Can Save series will highlight discussion on clean energy transition

 

LAWRENCE — The All We Can Save series at the University of Kansas returns this week with a virtual event titled “The Power of Local Advocacy: Beyond Coal to Clean Energy,” featuring Mary Anne Hitt, senior director of Climate Imperative.

Hitt will join Ali Brox, assistant teaching professor of environmental studies, and Madeleine Bonnallie, graduate student in English, for this moderated event, with opportunities for audience members to ask questions. The program will take place at 3 p.m. March 28; register online on Zoom.

Hitt previously worked for 12 years as the national director of campaigns for the Sierra Club and also served for a decade as director of the Beyond Coal Campaign. That campaign blocked the construction of 200 proposed coal plants in the U.S. and confirmed the closure of two-thirds of existing coal plants.

“The opportunity to connect with Mary Anne Hitt, whose career and experiences provide concrete examples of successful strategies used to work for a cleaner and more just future, means we can interact with someone whose national initiatives coincide with issues KU students are learning about in their classes and that are relevant to campus and the wider Lawrence community,” Brox said.

The All We Can Save series centers climate justice and draws from knowledge across and beyond fields of academic research. Contributors to the book “All We Can Save,” edited by Ayana Elizabeth Johnson and Katharine Wilkinson, share wisdom from their own experiences and work to inspire collective agency around the urgency of climate change. The KU series highlights activists, scholars, thinkers and others whose life work generates and speaks to ideas for action, survival and nourishment.

The All We Can Save series is supported by The Commons; the Hall Center for the Humanities; the Environmental Studies Program; the KU departments of African & African-American Studies, English, Geography & Atmospheric Science, and Geology; the Emily Taylor Center for Women & Gender Equity; the History of Black Writing; the Office of Multicultural Affairs; and the University Honors Program.

-30-

————————————————————————

 

KU News Service

1450 Jayhawk Blvd.

Lawrence KS 66045

Phone: 785-864-3256

Fax: 785-864-3339

[email protected]

http://www.news.ku.edu

 

Erinn Barcomb-Peterson, director of news and media relations, [email protected]

 

Today’s News is a free service from the Office of Public Affairs

 

KU News: KU Law competition teams repeat as national champions

0

From the Office of Public Affairs | http://www.news.ku.edu

Headlines

Contact: Emma Herrman, School of Law, [email protected], @kulawschool

KU Law competition teams repeat as national champions

LAWRENCE — In 2023, University of Kansas School of Law teams were top performers during the National Native American Law Students Association (NNALSA) Moot Court Competition and the UCLA Transactional Law Meet. This year, they saw continued success with back-to-back wins.

For the fourth consecutive year, a KU Law team won first place at the NNALSA Moot Court Competition on Feb. 23-24 at the University of Montana. The competition featured 51 teams from law schools from across the country. In a simulated appellate-level proceeding, teams make arguments to a panel of judges and answer questions. Judges assess the quality of legal reasoning, oral advocacy and knowledge of case law.

KU Law was represented by three teams: Jade Kearney, third-year law student, and Justin Shock, third-year law student; Skylee James, second-year law student, and Lauren Bretz, second-year law student; and Alex Nelson, first-year law student, and Cody White, first-year law student. James and Bretz advanced to the quarterfinals, where they took home the award for second-best brief. Kearney and Shock took it all the way to the final round, where they clinched the win. Kearney also took home the best speaker award.

“It is such an incredible honor to have won the NNALSA competition this year,” Kearney said. “I am so grateful for the support of the KU Law community and moot court program for making competitions like NNALSA a priority. I can’t wait to keep the legacy going in future years.”

It’s not just the hard work of the champions that results in such success, but also the work of those behind the scenes helping the KU Law students to prepare.

“KU’s success at this tournament year after year is the result of dedicated alumni and professors giving their time to support our students,” said Nancy Musick, coach of the KU Law teams.

This year, the NNALSA moot court team received alumni support from Dan Kopp, 2019 law graduate; Zach Kelsay, 2021 law graduate, and Maria Drouhard, 2019 law graduate. Three-peat champion Emily DePew, 2023 law graduate, also provided support by traveling with the teams and supporting them in person.

“Our success was a testament to the power of teamwork and collaboration,” Shock said. “Our victory would not have been possible without our coaches, Nancy Musick and Sarah Otto. Everyone in the competition contributed countless hours to aid us. This spirit of collaboration is something we hope to continue as we aspire to return the favor in future years by assisting incoming NNALSA competitors.”

KU Law students also traveled to California for the UCLA Transactional Law Competition on Feb. 23 at the UCLA School of Law.

KU Law was represented by two teams that competed against 20 others from around the country. The Gold Team included Violet Brull, second-year law student; Sydney Hoffman, second-year law student; Cayden Sears, third-year law student; and Kathleen Siderchuk, second-year law student, and was coached by Alex Reed, 2022 law graduate. The Blue Team included Liam Bigbee, second-year law student; Alex Falk, second-year law student; Brooke Flucke, third-year law student; and Gabby Phillips, second-year law student, and was coached by Eric Mikkelson, 1994 law graduate. After a long competition, the Gold Team won best overall for the second year in a row.

“I’m proud of our team’s work,” Brull said. “Each of our team members made invaluable contributions to the effort, as did our team’s coach, Alex Reed. I hope to compete for KU Law again next year, either at this or another transactional competition.”

In this competition, teams draft and negotiate sophisticated business acquisition agreements and compete in three distinct phases: preparation of the agreement on either the buyer or seller’s side, preparing markups for the opposing side’s draft agreement and meeting to negotiate the final contours of the deal.

Both Gold and Blue teams were supported by the Polsinelli Transactional Law Center housed at KU Law. Attorneys with Polsinelli and other law firms donate their time to support and prepare KU Law students for transactional law competitions.

“It was great to see KU Team Gold’s hard work pay off in Los Angeles by winning best overall,” said Reed, associate at Lathrop GPM. “The team put in many hours over the last few months and did an outstanding job representing KU Law on a national stage.”

Learn more about the moot court and transactional law programs at KU Law.

-30-

————————————————————————

 

KU News Service

1450 Jayhawk Blvd.

Lawrence KS 66045

Phone: 785-864-3256

Fax: 785-864-3339

[email protected]

http://www.news.ku.edu

 

Erinn Barcomb-Peterson, director of news and media relations, [email protected]

 

Today’s News is a free service from the Office of Public Affairs

Cattle Chat: Selecting a replacement female for the herd

0

K-State beef cattle experts share the pros and cons of retaining heifer calves born to first-calf heifers

Working in agriculture often involves a series of decisions, including which crops should be planted in a rotation, what inputs are most economical, and — in the case of rebuilding the cow herd — should replacement females that were born to first-calf heifers be retained?

This was the question that the Kansas State University Beef Cattle Institute experts addressed on a recent Cattle Chat podcast episode.

“There are a lot of factors that go into that decision as to whether or not keeping heifers born to heifers is a good idea, and it depends on the goal of the breeding program,” said K-State veterinarian Brad White.

White said with proper planning, beef producers can make retaining heifers born to heifers work for a herd. He said that if producers plan to do that, they need to plan and select sires that are adequate for calving ease but also offer maternal traits that are beneficial.

“I like to keep heifers born to first-calf heifers if they are born early in the breeding season and they are born to a mating that was genetically planned to create replacement females,” White said.

K-State veterinarian Bob Larson agreed, adding, “there are some AI (artificial insemination) sires that have good maternal traits while being adequate for calving ease that can make females worth considering as replacements.”

K-State nutritionist Phillip Lancaster sees one other genetic advantage of keeping replacement females born to first-calf heifers.

“I am going to boost the genetic progress of the herd overall much quicker by keeping the daughters of the youngest females in the herd,” Lancaster said.

However, Lancaster also said that it is important to look at the performance of the cow family that these potential replacement heifers are born from when making this decision.

“Take a look at the records and if that heifer is born to a proven cow line in terms of longevity and reproductive performance, that will help you make the decision about keeping the heifer calf that was born from a heifer in the herd,” Lancaster said.

Another factor to consider is the frame size of the replacement female being considered, said K-State veterinarian Brian Lubbers. The size concern relates to the pelvic size of the calf when she matures and is bred to calve her first calf.

“Some daughters born to calving ease sires may be predisposed to future calving difficulty due to their smaller frame size,” Larson said.

Lubbers also said the timing of when they were born as compared to the rest of the herd is something that should factor into the decision of keeping or selling that heifer calf.

“If the heifer calf was born late in the breeding season and she is small framed, then I would recommend producers do not retain them in the herd.”

To hear the full discussion, listen to Cattle Chat on your preferred streaming platform.

5 Basic Steps for Sizzling Steak

0

A sizzling steak is a surefire sound of summer, and the flavors achieved from one that’s perfectly grilled are hard to match.

Before you fire up your grill, consider these five basics for cooking a chef-worthy steak:

Prepare Your Cut

Taste preferences (and prices) may differ among sirloins, ribeyes, T-bones and more, but the way you prepare steaks likely won’t change much from cut to cut. You’ll want to trim the thickness down to 1/2-1 inch for proper cooking, and setting the meat out ahead of time allows it to warm to room temperature before hitting the grill. Placing a refrigerator-cool slab on hot grates works against you in two ways: first, the cold meat instantly chills your previously warm grill, and second, the inner portion of the steak will take longer to grill.

Add Some Salt

Feel free to add any spices that you prefer, but remember a good steak typically doesn’t require fancy seasoning – a pinch of salt works just fine. Add your salt anywhere between 30 minutes to a few hours before grilling time to help retain moisture and improve flavor.

Aim for High Heat

Grilling a steak correctly actually isn’t just about maintaining a sweltering flame. A two-zone fire is usually the way to go – one side of the grill should be hot (using direct heat) with the other side not quite as warm (indirect heat). This allows you to create a sear over direct heat before finishing cooking through – without burning – over indirect heat.

Sear and Slide

Speaking of searing: Cooking your steak over direct heat 1-2 minutes on each side is normally about right for creating a proper sear. At this point, depending on the thickness of your steak, you’ll want to check for doneness. If it’s not quite to the temperature you’re looking to achieve, simply slide it over to the indirect heat for a finishing touch.

Keep in mind these general guidelines for doneness: 120-125 F is rare, 130-135 F is medium-rare, 140-145 F is medium, 150-155 F is medium-well and 160-175 F is well done.

Let Rest

Finally, as hungry as you may be at this point, resting steaks is an important last step before diving in. Giving your steaks 5-10 minutes (foil or no foil) allows flavors to redistribute and moisture to be retained in the meat.

Beef industry gets partial labeling victory

0

Beef and agriculture groups generally welcomed a March 11 announcement by Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack approving voluntary “Product of USA” labels.

Vilsack made the announcement that the U.S. Department of Agriculture had finalized a rule regarding the labels’ use at the National Farmers Union Annual Convention in Scottsdale, Arizona. Labels are restricted to beef, poultry and egg products in which every step of production occurred inside the United States. The USDA said the policy “align[s] the voluntary ‘Product of USA’ label claim with consumer understanding of what the claim means.”

Partial victory

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association said in response, “NCBA has been committed to finding solutions to this problem ever since a producer-led NCBA working group raised the alarm, years ago, that imported beef could be mislabeled as a Product of the USA incorrectly at the end of the supply chain. We appreciate USDA’s effort to address this loophole. During the implementation period, NCBA’s focus will remain on ensuring that these changes result in the opportunity for producer premiums while remaining trade compliant.”

Because the label program is voluntary and not mandatory, as some cattle groups have been urging, reaction was mixed. Some groups said the move was only a positive first step toward the “mandatory country of origin labeling” they want. Bill Bullard, CEO of R-CALF, said, “While this is an important step in the right direction, Congress needs to pass MCOOL as quickly as possible to require all beef sold in grocery stores to be labeled as to where the animal from which the beef was derived was born, raised and slaughtered. Only then will consumers be informed as to which beef was produced by American cattle farmers and ranchers and which beef was produced under some foreign country’s food safety regime.”

The USDA’s final labeling rule allows the voluntary “Product of USA” or “Made in the USA” label claim to be used on meat, poultry and egg products only when they are derived from animals born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the U.S.  The labeling move was supported by petitions, thousands of comments from stakeholders and data from a nationwide consumer survey.

Processors don’t need prior approval but must maintain documentation supporting their claims. Businesses seeking to use the label must comply with the rule by Jan. 1, 2026.

Public comments

The final rule also allows other voluntary U.S. origin claims on meat, poultry and egg products, but those claims will need to be supported on the labels and in documentation. The USDA has published updated labeling guidance, which will be open for public comment for 60 days after publishing in the Federal Register. Public comments can be submitted at www.regulations.gov.

“Today’s announcement is a vital step toward consumer protection and builds on the Biden-Harris Administration’s work to bolster trust and fairness in the marketplace where smaller processors can compete,” Vilsack said. “This final rule will ensure that when consumers see ‘Product of USA’ they can trust the authenticity of that label and know that every step involved, from birth to processing, was done here in America.”

As reported in the High Plains Journal