Wednesday, January 14, 2026
Home Blog Page 4709

Make time to body condition score cows

0
Fall is a good time to do body condition scoring on the beef herd, as it can help prepare producers for management through the remainder of fall and into the winter.
Fall is a good time to do body condition scoring on the beef herd, as it can help prepare producers for management through the remainder of fall and into the winter.

A K-State beef cattle specialist discusses using cow body condition scores now as a guide to managing the cow-calf herd into the fall and winter.

 

COLBY, Kan. – The old tractor still runs, but because the fuel gauge is busted, you have to keep checking to make sure it has enough fuel to continue working. And whether you realize it or not, your cows function similarly to that old tractor.

 

“Body condition scoring is looking into a cow’s gas tank to see how much energy reserve she has,” said Sandy Johnson, beef cattle specialist for K-State Research and Extension. “We need an idea of where she’s at as we manage her condition in relation to the quality of our forages.”

 

A body condition score, or BCS, in cattle is a reflection of how well a cow is, or has been, meeting her nutritional requirements. Producers must provide that adequate nutrition to their cow herd. If a cow is not getting her required nutrients, the producer can’t expect her to do her job well, Johnson said.

 

Producers should score individual cows from 1 to 9, with 1 being thin and 9 being over-conditioned. A score of 5 or 6 at the time of calving is recommended to achieve timely rebreeding.

 

Johnson said beef producers should regularly determine the average BCS of their herd. Now is a good time in the production season, when cows are either bred for spring calving or have fall calves by side, to score the herd and prepare for management through the remainder of fall and into the winter.

 

“Intentionally writing down and tracking (body condition) will help you know what’s going on in your herd and help you plan for known changes in your cows’ nutritional requirements,” she said.

 

Sometimes it’s difficult for producers to see body condition changes occurring in the herd, especially if they see the cows every day, she added. Producers should simply take a few moments to score the cows while they’re checking them. An easy way is to write down the numbers 1 through 9 and place a tally mark by the corresponding score for each cow. Writing down the scores is important, along with the date, as it helps keep track of any changes over time.

 

“It doesn’t matter if you have a large group of cows and don’t score them all,” Johnson said. “If you score 20 to 30 percent, you’re probably going to have a sense of the herd average body condition score.”

 

How often should you score?

 

Johnson recommends body condition scoring at several key times in the production year: weaning, 90 days prior to calving, calving and the start of the breeding season. These key times are when the cows’ nutritional changes occur. Scoring every month or two during the grazing season also is useful.

 

As an example, 90 days prior to calving is usually when a cow needs more energy to meet the increased demands for her unborn calf, she said. At calving, lactation will require an additional increase in energy. Producers should score their herd at weaning so there is ample time to change cow condition prior to calving, if needed.

 

Scoring at these various points throughout the year can help producers evaluate the effectiveness of their pre-breeding and pre-calving nutrition programs.

 

“As our summers have gone here, with lots of rain to no rain to somewhere in between, monitoring (body condition) would certainly give you a good sense of what’s going on with your grass, what the quality and quantity is as we go later into the grazing season,” she said. “This could be helpful so we don’t take too much condition off of that cow.”

 

“So that cows can rebreed in a timely fashion, don’t take more condition off the cow than you have the time and feed resources to put back on by calving time,” she continued. “A cow needs to gain more than 100 pounds during the last trimester to account for fetal growth. If she doesn’t, she in effect loses body condition.”

 

What does an optimum condition cow look like?

 

This time of year a cow will still have a slick hair coat, Johnson said, which makes it an easy time to score her.

 

“As we look at her topline, it would appear smooth,” she described. “We wouldn’t see any of her spinous processes. When she’s not loaded up on water or feed, seeing her last two ribs is still acceptable in a BCS 5 cow. She will not have any build up of fat around her hooks and pins, or no fat around tail head. Essentially, her brisket is going to be tight with no evidence of excess fat. She would have no muscle atrophy, which we would see on a BCS 3 or lower cow that’s beginning to use muscle for energy. So, whatever muscle she has, a BCS 5 cow is showing her full amount.”

 

If cows are lower than a target score of 5 at calving, they will generally have a longer than normal post-partum interval, meaning they will take more time to rebreed, and the next calf will be younger and lighter when it is weaned, Johnson said. Managing body condition is one of the things producers can use to maintain or even shorten that post-partum interval.

 

“As we look at a 2-year-old, we might want to have her in a little better body condition,” she said. “She’s lactating, she’s growing and still trying to maintain her body, and so our typical feed resources might come a little shy of what she needs. She’s typically going to lose a little condition as she’s lactating. That BCS 6 gives us cushion to get her rebred in a timely fashion.”

 

Where can I learn more?

 

Johnson said there are numerous reliable resources online with images and charts to help producers properly BCS their cows. An example of how to figure BCS herd averages is available in the latest K-State Beef Tips newsletter (http://www.asi.k-state.edu/about/newsletters/Sept2014BT.pdf).

 

Contact your local extension agent for a variety of resources for body condition scoring and for help in properly scoring your herd. Johnson said you also can practice scoring cows at your local sale barn, where more variety and differences in cows is likely available.

By: Katie Allen

Why late lawn seedings often fail

0

We normally recommend that Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue be seeded in September but no later than October 15. Though plantings later than October 15 can be successful, the odds of success diminish as time passes.

The problem with late plantings is not that the seed will not come up or that young grass plants are sensitive to cold. Most often, the problem is with rooting. Unless the young grass plants have a fairly extensive root system, the freezing and thawing that takes place during winter heaves plants out of the ground, and they dry out and die.

Regardless of when planted, be sure the new lawn is kept watered through the fall. More mature lawns will need less frequent watering but all should go into the winter with moist soil.

 

By: Ward Upham

 

 

A trifecta of water-planning tools

0
K-State’s Mobile Irrigation Lab offers irrigators a variety of online water-planning tools that can help determine the best short and long-term cropping decisions and how to efficiently use available water.
K-State’s Mobile Irrigation Lab offers irrigators a variety of online water-planning tools that can help determine the best short and long-term cropping decisions and how to efficiently use available water.

Fall is a good time for irrigators to plan future cropping systems, and K-State’s Mobile Irrigation Lab has a variety of online tools that can help.

 

MANHATTAN, Kan. – As fall progresses into winter and harvest comes to a close, crop producers might want to consider planning their future crop rotations, crop mixes and irrigation use. The increasing demand for water in the future gives producers an even greater obligation to efficiently use the resource while optimizing yields.

 

That obligation is felt by many producers throughout Kansas, according to Danny Rogers, agricultural engineer for K-State Research and Extension. Through being involved in developing Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback’s 50-year water vision this past year, he knows water concerns, albeit different concerns, have risen in all parts of the state.

 

The largest single water user in the Kansas economy is irrigation, Rogers said, which in western Kansas is primarily provided by the High Plains Aquifer System, or in extreme western Kansas, called the Ogallala Aquifer due to the Ogallala Formation that makes up a majority of the geological High Plains Aquifer mass. Research at Kansas State University found that as much as 69 percent of the Ogallala would be depleted in the next 50 years, as water usage is exceeding the recharge.

 

In eastern Kansas, Rogers said various sedimentation issues are affecting many of the reservoirs that serve both public water supplies and crop irrigation. Some of those reservoirs are direct diversions from rivers administered by the Division of Water Resources, which means irrigators in eastern Kansas at times face unanticipated water limitations.

 

“Whether you’re in western Kansas facing declines, therefore limiting the total volume that you can physically apply during the season, or you’re in eastern Kansas where you might have an administrative reduction in your water right allocation by a certain percentage, now is the time to plan how to best optimize the use of that water in the next (crop production) seasons,” he said. “We have the tools that can help you do that.”

 

For those irrigators who are challenged with water availability in their irrigation programs, free online and downloadable tools are available on K-State Research and Extension’s Mobile Irrigation Lab (http://www.bae.ksu.edu/mobileirrigationlab/) to help them make the most of their water resources.

 

Among the variety of resources on the website, three main user-friendly and practical tools are available for crop producers to make water-planning decisions: the Crop Water Allocator, a tool used to plan optimum crop mixes for the next growing season; the Crop Yield Predictor, a tool used to predict yield, based on the amount of water and timing of irrigation within a specific season; and KanSched, an evapotranspiration, or ET-based scheduling tool used within a season to maintain acceptable levels of irrigation in fields.

 

Crop Water Allocator (CWA)

 

Rogers said the CWA was primarily designed for western Kansas, as it was m developed using data from K-State agricultural research centers in Colby, Tribune and Garden City.

 

Using the tool, irrigators can select from major Kansas crops they plan to plant and set their field conditions—volume of water, anticipated precipitation levels, soil type and acreage. All of the inputs are easy to select and change if needed using drop-down boxes on the new Web-based version. The resource is customizable for each producer.

 

Jonathan Aguilar, K-State Research and Extension water resource engineer, said making the Web-based CWA within the last year has been a positive change for irrigators and made the tool easier to use.

 

“When we developed the Web-based version, we also considered those people who are using mobile devices,” Aguilar said. “We envision the CWA being used while (producers) are out in the field and are able to share with other farmers what they are planning for the next season. Then maybe they can also get some feedback from the other farmers.”

 

Both the new Web-based version and downloadable software version are available on the Mobile Irrigation Lab website, and producers can use whichever version they prefer. The two versions work with the same end goal—achieving optimum returns—in mind.

 

“You can put in the limitations that your field experiences, and then the CWA will look at different combinations of crops for different water levels,” Rogers said. “It is a useful tool to help irrigators establish a crop rotation they might want to consider for the next few years. As we move to more deficit irrigation, crop rotation becomes an important consideration for those producers.”

 

As an example, Rogers said assume fully irrigated corn in a particular area might on average require 16 inches of irrigation, but a producer only has the ability to apply 10 inches. That producer can choose to grow corn at 10 inches for the entire field, or he or she might want to look at corn on part of the acres with other crops, or even fallow as an option on the other part of the acreage.

 

The allocator looks at the water availability a producer has in 10 percent increments of the available water. The land allocation can be split into units of land area as small as 25 percent sections of the total cropland base. The producer then selects which crops to be considered and customizes inputs such as yield potential and crop prices for the analysis.

 

Each crop will be evaluated in the different land segments with each increment of water, and eventually the CWA compiles the best combination of crop and water application depth for the producer to review.

 

“You can use this whether you’re looking at a single-field application or a whole farm application,” he said. “That would be your long-term strategy if you started a particular rotation. This is a guide to model what combination you might want to consider.”

 

Inputs in the allocator have default general values, and producers could use these values if they are applicable to their area, Aguilar said. But, producers can customize those, particularly their own yield goals and available irrigation levels, as needed.

 

Crop water use curves, showing the production increases with increased water use up to the crop’s yield potential, are built into the program, and producers would input what they believed to be their upper limit of productivity.

 

“Because there are differences in location due to soils and other various aspects, you wouldn’t want to input a 300 bushel an acre corn yield when the best yield you’ve ever had was 180 for fully irrigated corn,” Rogers said. “That would make it an unrealistic projection.”

 

Aguilar said in the past year, many on the K-State water team have hosted trainings to help producers better understand the CWA, its benefit to producers and how to properly use it. He is optimistic that those who attended the trainings will let others know how to use the tool, because they saw its usefulness firsthand.

 

In-season water planning tools

 

While the CWA could help producers with next season’s crop mixes and planning their long-term rotation strategy, another tool called the Crop Yield Predictor is available for in-season decisions.

 

“Using this tool, if you decided you wanted to plant a particular crop, and you’re projecting you’re going to put on a certain amount of water, you could play with what would be the best strategy of timing that irrigation,” Rogers said. “It’s a seasonal look at water that has a yield component in it, and it will tell you for this particular crop and this level of water what would be the best strategy.”

 

The Mobile Irrigation Lab’s baseline irrigation scheduling tool is KanSched, and it’s the tool Rogers said he strongly recommends that every producer, whether they’re deficit irrigating or fully irrigating, use for in-season daily decisions on irrigation.

 

“I often hear producers say, ‘I’m deficit irrigating. Once I start irrigating, I don’t have any other decisions to make.’ That’s not true,” he said. “It’s hard to remember, since we’ve gone through about four years of drought now, that there are times we have above-normal precipitation in western Kansas, and that there are opportunities to save water.”

 

A recent simulated irrigation schedule analysis (http://www.ksre.ksu.edu/irrigate/OOW/P14/LammDI14.pdf) that used a 43-year record of ET information showed many opportunities for water savings for limited-capacity wells within a season as compared to continuous in-season pumping, he said. Scheduling doesn’t guarantee a producer will always have enough water, but it does help guarantee the producer won’t miss opportunities to save water for future use.

 

“As we look forward, we see more policy models coming out where we could go to multi-year allocations of water rather than annual allocations of water,” Rogers said. “There’s benefit to a producer to save an inch or two of water this year that can then be applied in a following year. Because that water can be applied later, you have a much higher productivity value.”

 

Other tools to help with items such as pumping efficiency, and managing fuel and other energy costs, can be found on the Mobile Irrigation Lab at http://www.bae.ksu.edu/mobileirrigationlab.

Story by: Katie Allen

Calling dairy producers: October 28 webinar to focus on new farm bill program

0
grazing dairy cows
Dave Young

The Dairy Margin Protection Program was designed to protect from unfavorable margins.

MANHATTAN, Kan. – Kansas State University will host a webinar on the Dairy Margin Protection Program of the 2014 Farm Bill Oct. 28 at 10 a.m. CDT.

The free, one-hour webinar by K-State Research and Extension associate Robin Reid, will give a comprehensive view of the program and how producers might use it to manage risk in their operations.

Also called the MPP-Dairy program, it is a voluntary risk management program to protect dairy producers from unfavorable margins that can occur between the price of milk and the cost of feed inputs. It replaces the Market Income Loss Coverage (MILC) program of the 2008 Farm Bill.

“This is not a price support program like traditional dairy programs have been,” Reid said, adding that producers are eligible to participate if they have current commercial milk marketings from cows located in the United States, are U.S. citizens, are actively engaged in the operation, and are in conservation compliance.

Registration for the 2015 MPP-Dairy program ends on November 28th, 2014, so now is the time to learn more about the program and make a sign-up decision, she said.

More information about the webinar is available at http://www.agmanager.info/events/Webinars/default_Dairy.asp. The session will be recorded and available under the Farm Bill page on http://www.agmanager.info.

Communication is key for good landowner-tenant relationships.

0
Building-Soils-With-Cover-Crops
Photo: Klesick Family Farm

By Ryan Flaming, County Extension Agent, Agriculture & Natural Resources

 

Good tenant-landowner relationships are always based on good communication just like every good relationship. Often when a land owner requests terminating a lease, he says poor communication is the leading factor. Here are some examples of a few questions that might be a sign there is poor communication the tenant and landlord.

 

* Why are my yields less this year?

* Why are you going to plant that?

* Where is my share of the grain being stored this year?

* When is harvest going to start?

* Why are there cows in my field? How long will they stay?

* Why isn?t there a crop growing in the field right now?

* When am I getting paid?

* Why are my yields less this year?

 

As a tenant it is critical to be able to rent and to hold on to the land you are farming in order to remain profitable. It is very important that when property changes hands, you as a tenant make sure you do what you can to keep in good communication with new landlord.

 

I really encourage all tenants to build and maintain a strong relationship with their landlord.