Friday, February 6, 2026
Home Blog Page 369

Farm Fun on The Fourth

0
Thayne Cozart
Milo Yield

When I wuz a kid, the Fourth of July topped my list as the best summer holiday. Wuzn’t nuthin’ better than finding creative ways to enjoy fireworks. I’m writing this column on June 27 and my July 4th memories track back to some of those creative fireworks use. Here are some of them.

Back in the early 1950s, my ol’ pappy, Czar E. Yield, wuz one of the early farmers in Bourbon County to plant soybeans. At the time, soybeans were an innovative crop and it wuz before the advent of herbicides. Therefore, ol’ Czar saw fit to give little ol’ Milo a daily task of pulling cockleburs from one mile of soybean rows. You can imagine, I had little love for the task, but no alternative other than to do it.

So, in early July somehow I acquired a big batch of two-inch firecrackers and some punks for lighting them. Creative me put the firecrackers under the roots of cockleburs and blew them out of the ground. For sure it wuz less efficient than simply pulling the burs, but it wuz way more fun for me.

Back in those days, firework sales weren’t regulated and anyone could buy really dangerous fireworks like M80s. One way I enjoyed using M80s wuz as underwater explosives. I discovered that the fuse on an M80, once lit, would continue to burn under water. So, I would weigh down an M80 with a rusty steel washer, light the fuse, and drop it into a pool of water. When it exploded seconds later, a lot of the fish in the pool would rise to the surface. It wuz dangerous and unsportsmanlike, but to a farm kid it wuz fun in the extreme.

Another use of fireworks back on the farm wuz “marble war” with my good friend and neighbor, ol’ Brosen Burgh. He and I would each get a 3-inch-long threaded pipe nipple of half-inch diameter. We would cap one end of the pipe. Then the open end formed a 3-inch hand-held “marble cannon.” We would put a 2-inch firecracker inside the pipe and stuff a glass marble inside, leaving the fuse where we could light it.

When the firecracker exploded, the marble would blast out and easily travel 50 yards or more. Brosen and I would happily shoot marbles at each other. We never gave a thought to personal safety. Thankfully, we didn’t get injured. But we sure had a lot of dangerous fun.

***

Sometimes I wonder why it is that even the simplest everyday items in our lives can quickly become politicized. The most recent such item that I’ve become aware of is none other than milk. Yep! Just plain ol’ cows’ milk. Today, in woke America it’s become highly politicized.

From ancient times when humans first domesticated bovines, humans have drank milk. And, up until 130 years ago, they always drank raw milk straight from ol’ Bossy. In fact, I wuz raised on raw milk in my childhood in the mid-1900s. We had milk cows on our farm and we kept milk from the cow with the highest butterfat in her milk to drink and to cook with. In the milk barn, we strained the milk through a strainer pad to extract the flies, cow hair and bits of dirt and manure before we took it to the house for consumption. That was processing in its simplest form.

My earliest memory of raw cow milk wuz lifting the layer of thick cream from the top of the milk jar and putting it on top of my cold or hot cereal for breakfasts. That early experience with cream carried right into old age. I still use Half & Half every single day.

But, back to the controversy. From what I’ve read, 130 years ago pasteurizing milk wuz invented. That’s when the medical and nutrition experts came concluded that drinking raw, unpasteurized milk wuz dangerous. And, consumers bought into that conclusion because, yes, indeed, folks can get sick from the microorganisms in raw milk. But, history shows, the number of raw milk drinkers who became sick was always a minuscule number.

Millions and millions of folks drank raw milk for centuries with no side effects at all. Growing up, every farm kid I knew drank raw milk. And, not once in my life have I known anyone who got sick from raw milk.

The milk controversy today centers on the majority of milk drinkers who prefer their milk pasteurized at 70 degrees Centigrade and the growing minority of milk consumers who are choosing to go back to drinking raw milk. No longer are the raw milk drinkers confined to farmers, hippies and off-the-gridders. You can find “raw” milk on sale in corner shops and trendy health food stores across America. Its proponents argue that it helps with weight loss, gut health, lactose intolerance and natural disease tolerance. In short, pasteurization, once a consensus issue, has become the latest frontier in America’s never-ending culture war.

Public health officials say that drinking the milk is dangerous, and could lead to a spike in potentially deadly bacterial and viral infections. But still, I’ve read market data saying there has been at least a 20 per cent increase in demand for raw milk in the last year nationwide. State politicians are facing demands to liberalize decades-old food safety laws. Some states are even passing laws to allow raw milk sales. The latest bill to repeal an outright ban on raw milk hit the governor’s desk in Louisiana, after similar efforts in West Virginia, Iowa, Georgia and North Dakota.

The way I see it the milk controversy is easily solved uncontroversially. Let folks drink raw milk if they choose. If they get sick, they made the choice. Don’t let them sue if they get sick. As for me personally, I’d gladly go back to raw milk if I knew of a reliable dairy farm where I could buy it at a competitive price with pasteurized milk.

***

Okay, enuf about marble wars, milk wars, and culture wars. My words of wisdom for the week are: “We live in a time where intelligent people are silenced so that stupid people won’t be offended.” Also, “The biggest joke on mankind is that computers have begun asking humans to prove they aren’t a robot.” Have a good ‘un.

Spellbound

1
john marshal

Kansas is a conservative state but tends to avoid the far side. In the northeast is Kansas City, or three Kansas Cities ‒ the Kansas City of Wyandotte County, Johnson County, and Missouri’s Kansas City. They are comingled in a mash of urban reach and suburban sprawl over county and state borders, a tangle of half a dozen interstate highways and the conjunction of the Kansas and Missouri Rivers.

Kansas City, Kan., is a fulcrum of commercial buzz and industrial animation, home to Sporting KC soccer, a NASCAR track, outlet shopping. Tucked in below is Johnson County, Wyandotte’s sprawling southern neighbor, home to office parks, shopping malls, tech centers and mansions of the five-acre lawn.

Across the river in Missouri is big brother Kansas City, home to the Plaza Shopping District, Crown Center, a prominent airport north, the downtown Power and Light District and out east, the Royals baseball and Chiefs football stadiums.

To Kansans from away, this five-county bi-state metroplex is two million people and one large place: Kansas City of the Royals and Chiefs.

But in Missouri, trouble. The Royals are crowded and unhappy at Kauffman Stadium; the Chiefs are restless at Arrowhead, fussing for upgrades at the coliseum. Both teams seem willing to move.

Last April, voters in Jackson County, Mo., turned down a sales tax extension to help pay for a new downtown Royals baseball stadium and upgrades at Arrowhead. Voters said the proposal ‒ $2billion, $4 billion or more ‒ was vague and unfixed, the details slippery.

*

In Topeka last month, Kansas legislators embraced vague and slippery. The governor signed on, approving unknown billions in sales tax bonds on offer to help build a professional football or baseball stadium, or both, in metro-Kansas. The legislation expands the Kansas Sales Tax and Revenue (STAR) Bond program, a way to dedicate local sales taxes for bond repayment. Liquor taxes and sports gambling revenues could be included. The Kansas law may finance up to 70 percent of a stadium project at a minimum $1 billion.

Legislators approved, 84-38 in the House and 27-8 in the Senate. There were no hearings. This was necessary, they said, to keep the teams in the Kansas City area, leaving a strong implication that two Kansas stadiums are possible, at estimates of at least $2 billion each.

Producing 70 percent of a $2 billion (or $4 billion) project would require a lot of sports gambling, hot dog, T-shirt and beer sales.

Extensive studies have shown that stadium projects rarely return the public funds put into them. Decades of research says stadiums aren’t a big force for economic growth. The no-vote in Missouri was a message that locals prefer their money spent to improve the lives of residents, not the fortunes of sports team owners.

But Topeka was spellbound by the glittering allure of a professional sports franchise on the Kansas side. Chiefs and Royals lobbyists swarmed the Statehouse, pitching the high promise of rubbing elbows with the rich, the sublime status of professional sports, of becoming home to stars.

Royals executives arranged a steakhouse dinner in Lawrence for Democrats on June 17, the evening before the vote. The day of the vote the Chiefs sponsored a lunchtime block party just steps from the Capitol.

*

Missouri legislators are at odds with themselves, uneasy with the prospect of

losing one or both of their teams but realistic about the expense of keeping them. Lines of negotiation remain open.

“We want to keep the Chiefs and Royals in the state of Missouri,” said Sen. Denny Hoskins, a Warrensburg Republican, “but we can’t saddle taxpayers with billions of dollars in debt to help finance stadiums.”

Hoskins, a candidate for Missouri secretary of state, said the Kansas plan was a figment of lofty revenue estimates; stadiums there would not make enough to retire the bonds without additional help from Kansas taxpayers.

To brush off worry-warts, the Kansas plan is to remain evasive, its details secret. Any agreement on stadiums will be confidential by law until after it is signed.

See no trouble, have no trouble.

Colt Scores Big Upset At Belmont Stakes In Final Leg Of Triple Crown Race

0

When Luis Saez first rode Dornoch at Saratoga Racecourse in 2023, he told trainer Danny Gargan, “You have the Derby winner.”

While that did not come true, Dornoch did make good on that optimism by winning the first Belmont Stakes at Saratoga, New York, hugging the rail and holding off Mindframe to spring a major upset in the Triple Crown finale at odds of 17-1.

The horse co-owned by World Series champion Jayson Werth won the Belmont five weeks after a troubled trip led to a 10th-place finish in the Kentucky Derby.

This time, Dornoch sat off leader Seize The Grey, passed the Preakness winner down the stretch and held on for a half-length victory.

“I would put it right up there with winning on the biggest stage. Horse racing is the most underrated sport in the world, bar none,” said Werth, who won Major League Baseball’s championship with the Philadelphia Phillies in 2008.
“It’s the biggest game: You get the Derby, the Preakness, the Belmont. We just won the Belmont. This is as good as it gets in horse racing. It’s as good as it gets in sports,” Werth said.

It’s the first win in any Triple Crown race for Gargan and the second in the Belmont for Saez, who said he never lost faith in Dornoch.

“He’s one of the top three-year-olds in the country, and we’ve always thought it,” Gargan said. “We let him run his race, and he won. If he gets to run, he’s always going to be tough to beat.”

It’s the sixth consecutive year a different horse won each of the three Triple Crown races. Sierra Leone, the Derby runner-up who went off as the favorite, was third, and Honor Marie fourth.

Dornoch paid $37.40 to win, $17.60 to place, and $8.10 to show.
Todd Pletcher-trained Mindframe paid $6.80 to place and $4.20 to show and Sierra Leone paid $2.60 to show after a jumbled start and more directional problems.

There were no such issues for Dornoch, who triumphed at the track known as the graveyard of favorites for its penchant for upsets.

“No one believed in this horse,” Gargan said. “It’s speechless. He’s such a talented horse.”

Despite there not being a Triple Crown on the line, it’s a historic Belmont because the race was run at Saratoga for the first time in the venue’s 161-year history.

It returns next year while Belmont Park undergoes a massive, $455 million reconstruction with the plan for the Triple Crown race to go back to the New York track in 2026.

Having it at Saratoga necessitated shortening the race to 1-1/4-mile from the usual “test of the champion” 1-1/2-mile distance that has been a hallmark of the Belmont for nearly a century.

The temporary change contributed to getting more quality horses into the field who previously ran in the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, or both. At 1-1/4-mile distance, Dornoch crossed the wire in a time of 2:01.64.

Gargan doesn’t think if the race were at the usual distance the result would’ve been any different.

“I don’t think anybody was getting to him,” Gargan said. “I’d have to watch it again. I kind of got excited jumping around there when he got clear. I didn’t see anybody really making a bold move.”
+++30+++

Hay Harvest Has Changed

0

In his greatest imagination, Dad would have never believed how ranch hay processing could change in half a century.
Back then, Dad left his grocery store butcher job about noon and headed to the hay field.
A fairly-new John Deere 1020 tractor was hooked to a seven-foot sickle mower for cutting the grass field. By the next afternoon, the grass had dried enough for hay, so Dad raked it into windrows with the fairly-new side-delivery rake.
The well-used John Deere 15T twine square baler was hooked to the only tractor on the ranch. When Dad started baling the hay, something always went wrong. Either the baler knotter didn’t work, or the tying was so tight the bale twine broke; for sure something.
It was a one-man operation up to this point. There wasn’t a hay trailer, so, the small bales were dropped on the ground behind the baler. At about 5 o’clock, his son arrived at the ranch from a town job and started picking up the hay bales.
The half-ton pickup was driven from bale to bale, and the then-younger worker got out at each bale and threw it into the truck bed. About 39 bales would make a load when properly stacked.
Real work was still to come as the hay bales had to be unloaded and stored away. Dad generally pushed the bales off the pickup to the helper who stacked them into the open hay barn. It was a lot harder when the bales were stored in the hay mow.
This year has been entirely different. Dad’s grandson uses the ranch swing-type swather to mow down the grass. If weather cooperates, hay is ready to bale the next day.
Custom operators bale the hay into either big round bales or small square bales. While big bales are easier to handle, small bales are needed for feeding livestock in small pens.
Small bales are accumulated into eight-bale packs that are picked up with a tractor front-end loader and stacked on a hay wagon. The bales are easily unloaded with the tractor and stored in the hay barn.
Putting up hay is sure a lot easier than it used to be.
Reminded of Proverbs 27:25: “Grass can become hay, but a rancher must work diligently to harvest what he can for the livestock.”
+++ALLELUIA+++
XVIII–27–7-1-2024

Booby-Trapped

0
lee pitts

The feds came out with a list of rules that protect wolves but make living in the West like walking through a mine-field. The feds have now placed booby-traps everywhere in the West that are meant to trap people like you, so I’d watch my step if I were you.

It’s become very dangerous to tread anywhere on the 46% of the eleven western-most contiguous states that is public land owned by the U.S. government. For example, a person may NOT kill a wolf in the act of killing livestock on public land. If you do you’re facing serious prison time and legal bills up the wazoo. If you are one of those people who believe in the three S’s, as in shoot, shovel and shut up, be sure to bury the carcass on your neighbor’s property so he or she will be the one being someone’s girl friend in prison.

These new rules make it harder for urban dwellers too, not just ranchers. Suppose you live in a big city and take Fifi, your Poodle, for its daily walk in a park that, unbeknownst to you, is public property. And suppose a wolf jumps out of the weeds and starts killing and eating your beloved Poodle. And suppose you pick up a branch and start trying to beat said wolf so he’d stop munching on Fifi. Well, you’re going to be cell mates with the rancher because you can’t kill or injure a wolf in the act of injuring your pet.

As if to rub it in, you cannot go home and get your gun and go back to shoot the wolf now feeding on Fifi’s carcass. I’d think twice if I were you because it’s now illegal to kill a wolf on public property feeding on the dead carcass of an animal it murdered. You’re just supposed to stand there and watch the wolf tear and rip the meat from a dog that you loved dearly.

It is now illegal “to enter official enclosures or rendezvous sites where there is denning behavior.” Pardon me but I think you’d need a master’s degree in wildlife biology to be able to recognize “wolf rendezvous sites”. Are these rendezvous like mountain men and trappers traveled to 150 years ago or are they more like the rendezvous when a businessman cheats on his wife by meeting his secretary at some discreet hotel room? I think the feds should have given us some guidance here as to how to identify a wolf rendezvous site.

If you’re a public lands rancher you may not kill a wolf or harass a wolf just because it is hanging around your property. I think we should test this rule out by taking a few trapped wolves to Washington D.C. where they could hang out around the offices of Congresspeople. Just how long do you think it would be before they’d call out the combined might of all four major branches of the U.S. military to deal with said wolves. I bet you we’d have F-18 Hornets in the air, M1 Abram tanks on the ground and the U.S. Navy Seals trying to kill those wolves.

Here’s a government booby trap that could catch a lot of people: You cannot shoot a wolf just because you thought it was a coyote or something else. I bet I could select three photos, one each of a large dog, a coyote and a wolf and the experts at the Fish and Game Department couldn’t tell them apart. I’d advise you to find out if the bus stop where the bus picks up your little Billy and Vanessa is on public land. If it is DO NOT shoot the wolf that is deciding who to eat first, your son or your daughter. Just remember… to be safe DO NOT KILL OR INJURE A WOLF. PERIOD!

Don’t forget, the only time you can legally kill a wolf for killing your livestock is if it’s on tribal or private property. But I wonder what happens if you only wound the wolf on private property who then goes on public land to die?

These new rules are loaded with such booby-traps, just make sure you don’t get caught in one or you’ll be on the evening news doing the perp walk, dreading your first blind date in prison.