Thursday, February 5, 2026
Home Blog Page 369

Spellbound

1
john marshal

Kansas is a conservative state but tends to avoid the far side. In the northeast is Kansas City, or three Kansas Cities ‒ the Kansas City of Wyandotte County, Johnson County, and Missouri’s Kansas City. They are comingled in a mash of urban reach and suburban sprawl over county and state borders, a tangle of half a dozen interstate highways and the conjunction of the Kansas and Missouri Rivers.

Kansas City, Kan., is a fulcrum of commercial buzz and industrial animation, home to Sporting KC soccer, a NASCAR track, outlet shopping. Tucked in below is Johnson County, Wyandotte’s sprawling southern neighbor, home to office parks, shopping malls, tech centers and mansions of the five-acre lawn.

Across the river in Missouri is big brother Kansas City, home to the Plaza Shopping District, Crown Center, a prominent airport north, the downtown Power and Light District and out east, the Royals baseball and Chiefs football stadiums.

To Kansans from away, this five-county bi-state metroplex is two million people and one large place: Kansas City of the Royals and Chiefs.

But in Missouri, trouble. The Royals are crowded and unhappy at Kauffman Stadium; the Chiefs are restless at Arrowhead, fussing for upgrades at the coliseum. Both teams seem willing to move.

Last April, voters in Jackson County, Mo., turned down a sales tax extension to help pay for a new downtown Royals baseball stadium and upgrades at Arrowhead. Voters said the proposal ‒ $2billion, $4 billion or more ‒ was vague and unfixed, the details slippery.

*

In Topeka last month, Kansas legislators embraced vague and slippery. The governor signed on, approving unknown billions in sales tax bonds on offer to help build a professional football or baseball stadium, or both, in metro-Kansas. The legislation expands the Kansas Sales Tax and Revenue (STAR) Bond program, a way to dedicate local sales taxes for bond repayment. Liquor taxes and sports gambling revenues could be included. The Kansas law may finance up to 70 percent of a stadium project at a minimum $1 billion.

Legislators approved, 84-38 in the House and 27-8 in the Senate. There were no hearings. This was necessary, they said, to keep the teams in the Kansas City area, leaving a strong implication that two Kansas stadiums are possible, at estimates of at least $2 billion each.

Producing 70 percent of a $2 billion (or $4 billion) project would require a lot of sports gambling, hot dog, T-shirt and beer sales.

Extensive studies have shown that stadium projects rarely return the public funds put into them. Decades of research says stadiums aren’t a big force for economic growth. The no-vote in Missouri was a message that locals prefer their money spent to improve the lives of residents, not the fortunes of sports team owners.

But Topeka was spellbound by the glittering allure of a professional sports franchise on the Kansas side. Chiefs and Royals lobbyists swarmed the Statehouse, pitching the high promise of rubbing elbows with the rich, the sublime status of professional sports, of becoming home to stars.

Royals executives arranged a steakhouse dinner in Lawrence for Democrats on June 17, the evening before the vote. The day of the vote the Chiefs sponsored a lunchtime block party just steps from the Capitol.

*

Missouri legislators are at odds with themselves, uneasy with the prospect of

losing one or both of their teams but realistic about the expense of keeping them. Lines of negotiation remain open.

“We want to keep the Chiefs and Royals in the state of Missouri,” said Sen. Denny Hoskins, a Warrensburg Republican, “but we can’t saddle taxpayers with billions of dollars in debt to help finance stadiums.”

Hoskins, a candidate for Missouri secretary of state, said the Kansas plan was a figment of lofty revenue estimates; stadiums there would not make enough to retire the bonds without additional help from Kansas taxpayers.

To brush off worry-warts, the Kansas plan is to remain evasive, its details secret. Any agreement on stadiums will be confidential by law until after it is signed.

See no trouble, have no trouble.

Colt Scores Big Upset At Belmont Stakes In Final Leg Of Triple Crown Race

0

When Luis Saez first rode Dornoch at Saratoga Racecourse in 2023, he told trainer Danny Gargan, “You have the Derby winner.”

While that did not come true, Dornoch did make good on that optimism by winning the first Belmont Stakes at Saratoga, New York, hugging the rail and holding off Mindframe to spring a major upset in the Triple Crown finale at odds of 17-1.

The horse co-owned by World Series champion Jayson Werth won the Belmont five weeks after a troubled trip led to a 10th-place finish in the Kentucky Derby.

This time, Dornoch sat off leader Seize The Grey, passed the Preakness winner down the stretch and held on for a half-length victory.

“I would put it right up there with winning on the biggest stage. Horse racing is the most underrated sport in the world, bar none,” said Werth, who won Major League Baseball’s championship with the Philadelphia Phillies in 2008.
“It’s the biggest game: You get the Derby, the Preakness, the Belmont. We just won the Belmont. This is as good as it gets in horse racing. It’s as good as it gets in sports,” Werth said.

It’s the first win in any Triple Crown race for Gargan and the second in the Belmont for Saez, who said he never lost faith in Dornoch.

“He’s one of the top three-year-olds in the country, and we’ve always thought it,” Gargan said. “We let him run his race, and he won. If he gets to run, he’s always going to be tough to beat.”

It’s the sixth consecutive year a different horse won each of the three Triple Crown races. Sierra Leone, the Derby runner-up who went off as the favorite, was third, and Honor Marie fourth.

Dornoch paid $37.40 to win, $17.60 to place, and $8.10 to show.
Todd Pletcher-trained Mindframe paid $6.80 to place and $4.20 to show and Sierra Leone paid $2.60 to show after a jumbled start and more directional problems.

There were no such issues for Dornoch, who triumphed at the track known as the graveyard of favorites for its penchant for upsets.

“No one believed in this horse,” Gargan said. “It’s speechless. He’s such a talented horse.”

Despite there not being a Triple Crown on the line, it’s a historic Belmont because the race was run at Saratoga for the first time in the venue’s 161-year history.

It returns next year while Belmont Park undergoes a massive, $455 million reconstruction with the plan for the Triple Crown race to go back to the New York track in 2026.

Having it at Saratoga necessitated shortening the race to 1-1/4-mile from the usual “test of the champion” 1-1/2-mile distance that has been a hallmark of the Belmont for nearly a century.

The temporary change contributed to getting more quality horses into the field who previously ran in the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, or both. At 1-1/4-mile distance, Dornoch crossed the wire in a time of 2:01.64.

Gargan doesn’t think if the race were at the usual distance the result would’ve been any different.

“I don’t think anybody was getting to him,” Gargan said. “I’d have to watch it again. I kind of got excited jumping around there when he got clear. I didn’t see anybody really making a bold move.”
+++30+++

Hay Harvest Has Changed

0

In his greatest imagination, Dad would have never believed how ranch hay processing could change in half a century.
Back then, Dad left his grocery store butcher job about noon and headed to the hay field.
A fairly-new John Deere 1020 tractor was hooked to a seven-foot sickle mower for cutting the grass field. By the next afternoon, the grass had dried enough for hay, so Dad raked it into windrows with the fairly-new side-delivery rake.
The well-used John Deere 15T twine square baler was hooked to the only tractor on the ranch. When Dad started baling the hay, something always went wrong. Either the baler knotter didn’t work, or the tying was so tight the bale twine broke; for sure something.
It was a one-man operation up to this point. There wasn’t a hay trailer, so, the small bales were dropped on the ground behind the baler. At about 5 o’clock, his son arrived at the ranch from a town job and started picking up the hay bales.
The half-ton pickup was driven from bale to bale, and the then-younger worker got out at each bale and threw it into the truck bed. About 39 bales would make a load when properly stacked.
Real work was still to come as the hay bales had to be unloaded and stored away. Dad generally pushed the bales off the pickup to the helper who stacked them into the open hay barn. It was a lot harder when the bales were stored in the hay mow.
This year has been entirely different. Dad’s grandson uses the ranch swing-type swather to mow down the grass. If weather cooperates, hay is ready to bale the next day.
Custom operators bale the hay into either big round bales or small square bales. While big bales are easier to handle, small bales are needed for feeding livestock in small pens.
Small bales are accumulated into eight-bale packs that are picked up with a tractor front-end loader and stacked on a hay wagon. The bales are easily unloaded with the tractor and stored in the hay barn.
Putting up hay is sure a lot easier than it used to be.
Reminded of Proverbs 27:25: “Grass can become hay, but a rancher must work diligently to harvest what he can for the livestock.”
+++ALLELUIA+++
XVIII–27–7-1-2024

Booby-Trapped

0
lee pitts

The feds came out with a list of rules that protect wolves but make living in the West like walking through a mine-field. The feds have now placed booby-traps everywhere in the West that are meant to trap people like you, so I’d watch my step if I were you.

It’s become very dangerous to tread anywhere on the 46% of the eleven western-most contiguous states that is public land owned by the U.S. government. For example, a person may NOT kill a wolf in the act of killing livestock on public land. If you do you’re facing serious prison time and legal bills up the wazoo. If you are one of those people who believe in the three S’s, as in shoot, shovel and shut up, be sure to bury the carcass on your neighbor’s property so he or she will be the one being someone’s girl friend in prison.

These new rules make it harder for urban dwellers too, not just ranchers. Suppose you live in a big city and take Fifi, your Poodle, for its daily walk in a park that, unbeknownst to you, is public property. And suppose a wolf jumps out of the weeds and starts killing and eating your beloved Poodle. And suppose you pick up a branch and start trying to beat said wolf so he’d stop munching on Fifi. Well, you’re going to be cell mates with the rancher because you can’t kill or injure a wolf in the act of injuring your pet.

As if to rub it in, you cannot go home and get your gun and go back to shoot the wolf now feeding on Fifi’s carcass. I’d think twice if I were you because it’s now illegal to kill a wolf on public property feeding on the dead carcass of an animal it murdered. You’re just supposed to stand there and watch the wolf tear and rip the meat from a dog that you loved dearly.

It is now illegal “to enter official enclosures or rendezvous sites where there is denning behavior.” Pardon me but I think you’d need a master’s degree in wildlife biology to be able to recognize “wolf rendezvous sites”. Are these rendezvous like mountain men and trappers traveled to 150 years ago or are they more like the rendezvous when a businessman cheats on his wife by meeting his secretary at some discreet hotel room? I think the feds should have given us some guidance here as to how to identify a wolf rendezvous site.

If you’re a public lands rancher you may not kill a wolf or harass a wolf just because it is hanging around your property. I think we should test this rule out by taking a few trapped wolves to Washington D.C. where they could hang out around the offices of Congresspeople. Just how long do you think it would be before they’d call out the combined might of all four major branches of the U.S. military to deal with said wolves. I bet you we’d have F-18 Hornets in the air, M1 Abram tanks on the ground and the U.S. Navy Seals trying to kill those wolves.

Here’s a government booby trap that could catch a lot of people: You cannot shoot a wolf just because you thought it was a coyote or something else. I bet I could select three photos, one each of a large dog, a coyote and a wolf and the experts at the Fish and Game Department couldn’t tell them apart. I’d advise you to find out if the bus stop where the bus picks up your little Billy and Vanessa is on public land. If it is DO NOT shoot the wolf that is deciding who to eat first, your son or your daughter. Just remember… to be safe DO NOT KILL OR INJURE A WOLF. PERIOD!

Don’t forget, the only time you can legally kill a wolf for killing your livestock is if it’s on tribal or private property. But I wonder what happens if you only wound the wolf on private property who then goes on public land to die?

These new rules are loaded with such booby-traps, just make sure you don’t get caught in one or you’ll be on the evening news doing the perp walk, dreading your first blind date in prison.

“Prescriptions for Parks”

0

Doctors write prescriptions for medications all the time. However, have you ever heard of a doctor prescribing a walk in the park? While this prescription will not fit in a bottle, it can pack some powerful health benefits. It may sound strange, but doctors actually can prescribe time outdoors to their patients with the help of a national program, ParkRx.org. This free online program can help a patient track their outdoor activity and discuss more outdoor exercise options with their doctor.

 

In South Dakota, health care providers can contact the Department of Health to get a ” pad that is redeemable for a free 1 day pass to any South Dakota State Park or a discounted annual pass. Minnesota, Iowa, Wyoming, Montana, and Nebraska all have Walk with a Doc” programs where you can meet at a public location to walk with a doctor and other health-minded individuals. Spending time in nature has been proven to help both physical and mental health.

 

A review of 20 medical trials of participants who spent time in a forest environment found that their blood pressure was significantly lower after being in a forest than it was in a non-forest environment. Additionally, this improvement lasted for several days after being in the wooded area. These participants did not need to go for hikes, simply walking in, sitting in, or viewing the forest was able to give the participants lower blood pressures. This worked both for people with high blood pressure and normal blood pressure. It also showed improvement regardless of age as children, young adults, and older adults all had similar findings.

 

One study found that children who spend more time outdoors have reduced rates of nearsightedness. Children who spent more time outdoors also have a lower risk of developing asthma according to another study. Increasing outdoor play also decreases BMI in preschoolers and lowers obesity in adults.

Time outside has also been shown to be associated with improved sleep and sleep quality. Spending time outdoors has been linked to improving the immune system and decreasing stress. While spending time in State Parks and Forests is beneficial, even walking around the local neighborhood and being in an outdoor green space” has shown to have health benefits.

 

Of course, no medication is without side-effects. The great outdoors has bugs, you can get sunburned or there are uneven surfaces and loose gravel. So when you are going outside, remember to use sunscreen or wear a wide-brimmed hat and have bug repellent if going into areas where there are mosquitos and ticks. It is also important to have proper fitting shoes for your adventures to prevent blisters and slips or falls. With all the benefits of spending time outdoors, it just makes sense that doctors should write prescriptions for outdoor activities. So get out into nature to stay healthy out there!

 

Jill Kruse, D.O. is part of The Prairie Doc® team of physicians and currently practices as a hospitalist in Brookings, South Dakota. Follow The Prairie Doc® at www.prairiedoc.org and on Facebook and Instagram featuring On Call with the Prairie Doc®, a medical Q&A show providing health information based on science, built on trust, streaming live on Facebook most Thursdays at 7 p.m. central.